Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Clinton Campaign Alleges “Voter Suppression and Intimidation” by Obama Campaign

June 7, 2008

“An egregious effort by the Obama campaign to manipulate the voter registration process in its own favor, thereby disenfranchising countless voters”

Although Hillary Clinton is now encouraging her fellow Democrats to vote for Barack Obama, she (or at least her staff) had serious concerns about the manner in which his campaign was conducting itself in Nevada. Click on the link for the complaint that Hillary Clinton’s campaign filed against Barack Obama’s campaign for what sounds a lot like election fraud and voter intimidation.

clinton_complaint12308

Here is a transcript (per optical character recognition of the original document):

RYAN, PHILLIPS, UTRECHT 5. MACKINNON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
’ Nonlawyer Partner
1133 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 293-1177 Facsimile (202) 293-3411

January 23, 2008
Jill Derby, Chair Nevada State Democratic Party 1210 South Valley View Road Suite 114 Las Vegas, NV 89102

Dear Chair Derby:
I write on behalf of Hillary Clinton for President (”the Committee”) in regard to the January 19, 2008 Nevada Democ-ratic Caucus. The Committee is aware of a letter addressed to you today from the Obama for America campaign requesting an inquiry into the conduct of the caucuses. The Committee shares the Obama campaign’s concern that full participation in the democratic process may have been compromised by the substantial number of irregularities occurring at the caucuses, and we fully support a complete inquiry by the Nevada State Democratic Party (the ”Party”) into all caucus improprieties.

This letter is not intended as a response to the Obama campaign’s letter. However, in the interest of a complete record, and in contrast to the alleged minor procedural problems noted by the Obama campaign, the Committee wishes to bring to your attention information we have received evidencing a premeditated and predesigned plan by the Obama campaign to engage in systematic corruption of the Party’s caucus procedures. Compounding this blatant distortion of the caucus rules was an egregious effort by the Obama campaign to manipulate the voter registration process in its own favor, thereby disenfranchising countless voters. Finally, the Committee has received a vast number of reliable reports of voter suppression and intimidation by the Obama campaign or its allies.

The Committee had 30 phone lines on Saturday to receive calls in its Las Vegas offices. These lines rang continuously from early morning until well after the caucuses concluded with reports from people who were victimized and who observed irregularities. The phone lines were so overwhelmed that many callers resorted to calling individual Committee staff cell phones to report that they could not get through. The Committee also received many similar calls at its national headquarters.

The Committee is confident that any investigation into the conduct of the caucuses will be thorough, fair and in the interest of insuring that future Party caucuses will be as open and democratic as possible.

Systematic Corruption of the Party’s Caucus Procedures
The Committee received substantially similar reports of improprieties of such a number as to leave no conclusion but that the Obama campaign and its allies and supporters engaged in a planned effort to subvert the Party’s caucus procedures to its advantage. For example:

þ Preference cards were premarked for Obama.
(more…)

The Democrats’ Impending Train Wreck

March 30, 2008

The Democratic Party is heading for a massive train wreck during its summer convention, and this is to the party’s long term benefit. Although there is no way the Democrats can win the 2008 Presidential contest at this point, they will also have a chance to rid themselves of the cancer that has infested their party for the past decade. We mean the extreme Left that is totally outside the mainstream of American values and ideals, and Barack Obama personifies the disease.

The Democrats’ problem is that Obama developed a significant but not decisive lead in pledged delegates before his party discovered that he is “damaged goods:” an individual whose proven record of consorting with and even promoting racists, anti-Semites, America haters, Israel haters, and Catholic-hating bigots makes him unelectable. If Obama was really thinking about the good of the Democratic Party, he would withdraw from the contest in favor of Hillary Clinton, just as Eliot “Client 9” Spitzer resigned after he became a liability to his party. (more…)

Republicans Who Won’t Support McCain…

February 8, 2008

Ann Coulter, we are talking about YOU.
If you sit this election out and don’t vote, you ARE voting… for one of the following. We encourage Republicans who don’t like McCain’s positions to vote for Romney and Huckabee in the remaining primaries to tell McCain that they want him to move further to the right. On the other hand, your choice this November will be between McCain and his 10-35% Americans for Democratic Action rating, and Clinton or Obama with 95-100% ADA ratings.

McCain/Obama

McCain/Clinton

Clinton and Obama Campaigns Accuse Each Other of Voter Intimidation and Election Misconduct

January 26, 2008

Is this the kind of person whom you want with her/his hands on the United States 3000-plus nuclear weapons? The alleged behavior is suitable for a banana republic, Third World dictatorship, or Neo-Tsar Vladimir Putin’s Russia, not for the United States.

From http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hqblog and also http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2008/images/01/23/nv001.pdf

January 22, 2008

Jill Derby, Chair
Nevada State Democratic Party
1210 S. Valley View Road
Suite 114
Las Vegas, NV 89102

Dear Chair Derby:

On behalf of the Obama for America campaign, I am writing to request that the Nevada State Democratic Party conduct an inquiry into an apparent and disturbing pattern of incidents reported at precinct locations throughout the state during the January 19 Caucus.  

These reports suggest the possibility of activity conducted in violation of Party rules and the rights of voters—activity that, as the volume and distribution of those complaints indicate, may have been planned and coordinated with the willful intention to distort the process in the favor of one candidate, Senator Clinton.  A sheet of instructions provided by the Clinton campaign to its precinct works captures its program for the Caucus: “It’s not illegal unless they [the temporary precinct chairs] tell you so.”  (See attachment).  This certainly suggests that, for the Clinton campaign, the operative standard of conduct was, simply and only, what it could get away with.

On the day of the Caucus, we received by phone reports of misconduct, violations of the rules and irregularities, in the hundreds.  Since that time, well over a thousand more accounts have been sent to us.  Others have begun to emerge in other sources. http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/sleaze-in-nevad.html#more (more…)

Obama: Hillary Clinton’s “increasingly desperate attacks and accusations”

January 25, 2008

For the record, for use in the November election. Democratic Senator Barack Obama says that Hillary Clinton is engaging in “increasingly desperate attacks and accusations” and that she has lied about her intentions not to attack fellow Democrats during the primaries. Please copy and circulate the following screen shot from Barackobama.com for use against She Who Must Not Be Named in the November election.

Hillary Attacks

Days since Senator Clinton promised she was not interested in attacking Democrats:75

Days that Senator Clinton has spent attacking Democrats since making that promise:71

“I’m not interested in attacking my opponents, I’m interested in attacking the problems of America…”
Hillary Clinton, 11/10/07

As her lead in the polls shrinks, Senator Clinton’s flagging campaign grows more desperate each day. This web site will chronicle and rebut the increasingly desperate attacks and accusations being produced by the Clinton campaign.

Should Barack Obama campaign on Hillary Clinton’s behalf after he loses the primaries, we encourage Republicans to produce the above screen shot from his Web site and ask, “Were you lying then, or are you lying now?”

National Jewish Democratic Council Rightly Condemns Ron Paul

January 10, 2008

but has yet to respond on Obama’s and Clinton’s promotion of Al Sharpton
by Bill Levinson

The National Jewish Democratic Council has rightly pointed out some serious concerns with Ron Paul’s background, and they must be taken seriously in light of Paul’s failure to publicly repudiate Stormfront.org’s proffered support.

NJDC’s ongoing refusal to similarly condemn Hillary Clinton’s and especially Barack Obama’s promotion of the prominent anti-Semite and racist Al Sharpton, however, suggests that NJDC’s real problem is with Republicans as opposed to anti-Semites and racists. NJDC seems to have no problem whatsoever with vicious anti-Semitic and racist hate mongers as long as they are Democrats. It wouldn’t surprise us if NJDC were to whitewash and sanitize Adolf Hitler if he ran as a Democrat, or if a Democrat cited Mein Kampf as his or her primary source of inspiration. It is a matter of record that the following was sent to the NJDC on January 2, and it is also a matter of record that no response was ever received.

January 2, 2008
NJDC Asked to Join in Challenging Candidates’ Anti-Semitic and Racist Connections (more…)

NJDC Asked to Join in Challenging Candidates’ Anti-Semitic and Racist Connections

January 3, 2008

To: njdc “at” njdc.org, nynjdc “at” njdc.org
From: Bill Levinson
Posted to IsraPundit and other blogs

The National Jewish Democratic Council has rightly challenged Ron Paul’s acceptance of $500 from former Ku Klux Klansman Don Black, the proprietor of “White Pride World Wide” Stormfront.org. While the Paul campaign states that this merely takes $500 from Black’s pocket without buying him anything from the Paul campaign, it does buy him some something: publicity. It is a matter of record, as shown by our screenshot of our message to Ron Paul, that this has been pointed out to him. Furthermore, it is a matter of record that we have asked the Paul campaign to disown and repudiate the Ron Paul for President banner ads that are running at Stormfront.org.

It is also a matter of record that we asked the National Jewish Democratic Council to state a position on Hillary Clinton’s, Barack Obama’s, and John Edwards’ promotion and empowerment of the prominent racist and anti-Semite Al Sharpton. So far, this request has gone unacknowledged and unanswered. (more…)

Huckabee: Clinton’s Lips Stuck to Soros’ Ass

December 27, 2007

 Mike Huckabee said, and rightly so, ”If you can’t get your lips off the backside of George Soros long enough to use those lips to say it’s wrong to declare a sitting general . . . guilty of treason, how would you ever expect to have the support of the very military you might have to send into deadly battle?”

U.S. Flags Topple when Hillary Clinton walks past!

November 12, 2007

According to Penn State legend, the stone obelisk that marks the geographical center of Pennsylvania will fall over when a virgin walks past. We now have photographic evidence of what happens to the U.S. Flag when Hillary Clinton walks past!

Clinton Campaign Funded by Terror Suspects

November 7, 2007

Hillary takes cash from terror suspects: Muslim donors targets of federal investigation

Presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., has taken thousands of dollars in cash donations from Islamists under federal investigation for terror-financing, money laundering and tax fraud, WND has learned.

The Democrat senator over the past seven months has received $1,000 from M. Yaqub Mirza and another $500 from M. Omar Ashraf, federal campaign records show. Federal agents raided the Virginia homes and offices of the Muslim donors after 9/11 for ties to terrorism.

Others tied to the still-active probe also have contributed money to Clinton, including one Muslim man who after 9/11 complained the U.S. government should focus on changing its Mideast policies instead of killing Osama bin Laden and other Islamic terrorists.

Mirza, who also has given to other candidates, including Republicans, is said to act on behalf of Saudi millionaire Yassin al-Qadi, who the U.S. Treasury Department in October 2001 blacklisted as an al-Qaida financier.

Res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself.