Obama’s Sword of Damocles: October Surprise Won’t Surprise Us

[Placed in the public domain, copying and widespread circulation are encouraged]
Obama’s Sword of Damocles: October Surprise Won’t Surprise Us
Looming Scandal Will “Toricelli” Barack Obama After Democratic National Convention

The Democratic Party’s superdelegates, even those who have endorsed Barack Obama, need to do some serious reconsideration between now and the convention. Should Obama become the nominee, the Democrats are likely to find themselves in the same situation as they did with Robert Toricelli (D-NJ) in 2002. As described by Wikipedia (more information at the Washington Post),

    In the middle of an increasingly competitive race against Republican Doug Forrester, Torricelli decided not to run for reelection after disclosure of illegal contributions to his campaign by David Chang, a businessman connected to North Korea. In a speech, Torricelli stated that despite his leaving public office in a different way than he planned, he was proud of his service.

The Democratic Party then had to persuade the New Jersey Supreme Court to bypass the deadline for ballot changes to replace Toricelli with Frank Lautenberg. It is more than likely that the Democrats will find themselves in the same situation this year if Obama becomes the nominee, because of Obama’s questionable use of the United Church of Christ’s tax exempt resources to support his campaign. The Internal Revenue Service is currently investigating Obama’s church and, depending on when it announces its findings, it will render Obama unelectable or (should be be elected before the IRS announces its findings), leave him with a crippled and scandal-ridden Presidency.

It is already a matter of record that a scandal involving misuse of tax-exempt resources to support a political campaign can destroy an entire organization and even a Presidential campaign. In 2000, the 501(c)(3) tax exempt Million Mom March promoted House candidates on its “Apple Pie Award” Web page while relegating pro-Second Amendment legislators to the “Time Out Chair.” This was brought to the attention of a pro-Second Amendment columnist who published the following column:

    May 10, 2000
    Perhaps they need a background check on their tax knowledge

    By J.R. Labbe
    Knight Ridder Newspapers

    But while the dot-com demonstrators attempt to convince lawmakers (who won’t be anywhere near Capitol Hill on a weekend) that they echo the majority voice of American motherhood, keep this in mind:

    The Million Mom March is violating federal law.

    At least that’s the view from here. Hardly a soul can question the organization’s political nature. Just check out its Web site, with the “Time Out Chair,” which threatens to unseat politicians who don’t vote the way MMM wants.

    “Come Mothers’ Day, we mothers will stand together on the mall of Capitol Hill to remind your PRO-GUN House that on Election Day, the voters will stand by our children,” writes Rene King of Kentucky, in a letter posted by MMM castigating House Majority Whip Tom DeLay.

    Or how about the Mom’s Apple Pie Awards, serving up sugary kisses to “Rep. Joe Hoeffel, D-Pa., who plans to co-sponsor a bill next year, along with Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., that would require the licensing of handgun owners and the registration of handguns. It would also require gun purchasers to undergo background checks, take a gun safety course, and wait three days before acquiring a gun. … It will be up to us to convince Congress to pass it.”

    ….MMM has every right to champion politicians who support its cause and torment those who don’t. It can even lobby Congress for more gun control. But not as a nonprofit organization that receives preferential tax-exempt status.

    Again, MMM’s Web site: “We have 501-c(3) status as a nonprofit tax entity …. Contributions are tax deductible.”

    How can this be, you ask, when federal tax law expressly prohibits 501(c)(3) nonprofits from engaging in political activity?

    According to the Internal Revenue Service’s frequently asked-questions list: “501(c)(3) organizations may not engage in political activity, including endorsing candidates, but other organizations, such as 501(c)(4) organizations, may engage in political activity so long as that is not their primary activity.”

Had the National Rifle Association used its immense resources to follow up on this instead of preaching to the choir about how the MMM’s Mother’s Day rally was a “thinly disguised campaign for Al Gore,” the gun control movement would probably have been wiped off the face of the earth in 2000 along with many of the legislators who attached their names to it. As it was, the Million Mom March reacted visibly to Labbe’s piece with obviously desperate efforts at damage control. The damage control didn’t work. Other tax exempt entities, such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, distanced themselves from the Million Mom March while outraged donors, who were not told the real use to which their money was being put, cut off funding. The result was that the Million Mom March was so badly crippled that it could not help Al Gore get those few hundred votes he needed in Florida, so this scandal might arguably have decided the 2000 election (in combination with Gore blowing Tennessee, West Virginia, and Arkansas all on his own). The Million Mom March liquidated the next year, possibly to avoid the scandal of a formal IRS revocation of its 501(c)(3) status.

Like the Million Mom March, the United Church of Christ is a tax-exempt entity that is explicitly not permitted to use its resources, or allow their use, on behalf of any candidate for public office, and the IRS is investigating it for exactly the same reason–with Barack Obama bearing the primary responsibility.

    Obama’s General Synod speech prompts IRS to investigate UCC’s tax-exempt status

    Written by J. Bennett Guess
    February 26, 2008

    The Internal Revenue Service has notified the United Church of Christ’s national offices in Cleveland, Ohio, that the IRS has opened an investigation into U.S. Sen. Barack Obama’s address at the UCC’s 2007 General Synod as the church engaging in “political activities.”

    In the IRS letter dated Feb. 20, the IRS said it was initiating a church tax inquiry “because reasonable belief exists that the United Church of Christ has engaged in political activities that could jeopardize its tax-exempt status.

The “political activities” in question involve Barack Obama’s “A Politics of Conscience,” which he delivered at the UCC’s 50th anniversary General Synod in Hartford, Conn., on June 23, 2007. The UCC says that Obama agreed beforehand that his speech would contain no campaign-related content, but a transcript of “A Politics of Conscience” shows extensive campaign-related content. Furthermore, the speech was apparently pre-written; in other words, Obama did not get carried away in the heat of the moment, forget himself, and talk about his Presidential ambitions. If the UCC’s statements are accurate, Obama chose in advance to break his word to his own church, violate its trust, and get it into trouble with the IRS. If the IRS releases its findings before November, it is the end of Obama’s candidacy. If it releases them afterward (assuming that Obama wins the election), his Presidency will be a sick practical joke on the American people.

The UCC posting says,

    “The United Church of Christ took great care to ensure that Senator Obama’s appearance before the 50th anniversary General Synod met appropriate legal and moral standards,” Thomas told United Church News. “We are confident that the IRS investigation will confirm that no laws were violated.”

    Before Obama spoke to the national gathering of 10,000 UCC members, Associate General Minister Edith A. Guffey, who serves as administrator of the biennial General Synod, admonished the crowd that Obama’s appearance was not to be a campaign-related event and that electioneering would not be tolerated. No political leaflets, signs or placards were allowed, and activity by the Obama campaign was barred from inside the Hartford Civic Center venue.

We assume that Obama heard this as well, but he chose to go ahead and electioneer anyway. Furthermore, ”IRS Investigation: A Test Of Church’s Faith?” by UCC minister Davida Foy Crabtree in the Hartford Courant asserts

    Our purpose in inviting Sen. Obama in the spring of 2006 — long before he was a candidate for the presidency — was to ask him to address the connection between his Christian faith and his public service, to speak to us of the challenges for people of faith in the public square today. And he did so with eloquence. As a prominent member of our church, his was a natural invitation, just as the others were. To avoid any hint of endorsement or promotion, our national officers and our denominational attorney established clear understandings with Sen. Obama’s office in Washington. He readily agreed to all of them. We made it clear not only to his campaign staff but also to our own synod delegates and visitors that no advocacy or promotion of his candidacy would be permitted.

In summary,

(1) Barack Obama and his campaign staff were told of the rules ahead of time.
(2) Barack Obama understood and agreed to these rules.
(3) As shown by “A Politics of Conscience,” he chose to violate these rules after indicating his understanding and agreement, thus getting the UCC into trouble with the IRS.

A Politics of Conscience

Written by Senator Barack Obama
June 23, 2007

In other words, he wrote it ahead of time, with the full knowledge that electioneering on tax exempt church resources was forbidden, as opposed to forgetting himself in the heat of the moment.

    …It’s been several months now since I announced I was running for president. In that time, I’ve had the chance to talk with Americans all across this country. And I’ve found that no matter where I am, or who I’m talking to, there’s a common theme that emerges. It’s that folks are hungry for change – they’re hungry for something new. They’re ready to turn the page on the old politics and the old policies – whether it’s the war in Iraq or the health care crisis we’re in, or a school system that’s leaving too many kids behind despite the slogans.

    …Our conscience can’t rest so long as 37 million Americans are poor and forgotten by their leaders in Washington and by the media elites. We need to heed the biblical call to care for “the least of these” and lift the poor out of despair. That’s why I’ve been fighting to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit and the minimum wage. If you’re working forty hours a week, you shouldn’t be living in poverty. But we also know that government initiatives are not enough. Each of us in our own lives needs to do what we can to help the poor. And until we do, our conscience cannot rest.

    Our conscience cannot rest so long as nearly 45 million Americans don’t have health insurance and the millions more who do are going bankrupt trying to pay for it. I have made a solemn pledge that I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family’s premiums by up to $2500 a year. That’s not simply a matter of policy or ideology – it’s a moral commitment.

Compare this to Dr. Crabtree’s statement, “To avoid any hint of endorsement or promotion, our national officers and our denominational attorney established clear understandings with Sen. Obama’s office in Washington. He readily agreed to all of them. We made it clear not only to his campaign staff but also to our own synod delegates and visitors that no advocacy or promotion of his candidacy would be permitted.”

The Internal Revenue Service’s letter to the UCC
alleges not only that Barack Obama delivered a speech with campaign-related content as described above, but also that his supporters–again contrary to the rules to which he and his campaign agreed–staffed campaign tables outside the event. The IRS writes, “In addition, 40 Obama volunteers staffed campaign tables outside the center to promote his campaign.”

We can reach only one conclusion, we think the public will agree with us, and we think this scandal is enough by itself to end Barack Obama’s campaign.

(1) The United Church of Christ invited Barack Obama, as a prominent public figure, “to reflect on the intersection of [his] faith and …respective vocations or fields of expertise.”
(2) In doing so, the UCC reminded Obama and his staff that, as a tax-exempt religious institution, it could not allow any election-related activity.
(3) Obama and his staff said they understood this condition and promised to observe it.
(4) Obama then wrote a speech that he knew violated the condition to which he had agreed, while his campaign allegedly staffed campaign tables around the church meeting, again in violation of the rules to which the Obama campaign had agreed.

Note that all of the above information consists of objective evidence, such as the IRS’s letter and material directly from the United Church of Christ itself. It did not come from the Clinton or McCain camp, and therefore cannot possibly be construed as a “smear” of Barack Obama–even though his backers like Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright construe any criticism of their behavior as a smear, racism, or both.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Obama’s Sword of Damocles: October Surprise Won’t Surprise Us”

  1. dapdaddy10 Says:

    Go Get A Life. The conservative movement is dead. Only thing that came out of it was a bunch of racists and one of the worst presidents of all time.

  2. wingedhussar1683 Says:

    “one of the worst presidents of all time.”

    Well, that is what you get for offering Genghis John the Khan Kerry as the alternative, and it is what you will get for offering a sick joke like Obama this time around.

  3. omegetymon Says:

    Hey,I’d bet that these fascist diatribes of yours would have less pride of fact
    if you knew that the first Reichsfuhrer of Hitler was a Jewish man by the name
    of Joseph Berchtold,(1897-1962). Serve that up with the PRIDE in PURITY

    • giftoluv Says:

      omegetymon I am on the edge of my seat wondering where you got this information that SS Leader Joseph Berchtold was Jewish? Doing research of my own and been looking to see if he was Jewish by finding nothing at all. If anything I find reasons why he can not be Jewish, such as the fact that the SS in the early years had to track their genealogies back to 1750 to prove they were not only of clean German bloodlines, but to prove that they were not Jewish. This being the case wouldn’t it be rather impossible that he was Jewish? Please provide source information as I can find none online and no one else stating that this is the case.

  4. berlet98 Says:

    Dat Dapdaddy! He be a trip!

    I do object to that sword of Damocles metaphor though. I used it first in reference to the Islamic terrorist threat so NO ONE else can use it! 🙂

    See my press release for my book:

    That Sword of Damocles Is Suspended Over America

    This new book confronts the rather significant question of why the United States of America has accepted the inevitability of another Islamic terrorist attack. More importantly, it addresses America’s options to avoid that fate. The author’s plan is politically incorrect and has the added attraction that it will work.

    New York, NY (PRWEB) March 31, 2008 — iUniverse, Inc. announced the release of “An Immodest Proposal for Ending and Winning the War on Terror: A Curmudgeon’s Plan for Survival”, by Gene Lalor, Ph.D. In this critical election year, this book is an essential read.

    After examining why America is in dire straits, the author outlines a 10-point plan for avoiding all-out war with Islam, this war on terrorism which may represent the early stages of World War III. That possibility renders Iraq and Afghanistan all but inconsequential. In the dubious eventuality that the first phase does not succeed, Lalor offers Phase Two, a 10-point plan for decisive victory over terrorism.

    An Immodest Proposal for Ending and Winning the War on Terror
    “An Immodest Proposal for Ending and Winning the War on Terror” rejects the corruption of political correctness which has put America in an untenable defensive posture. It defies the prevailing wisdom that terrorism can be ended via conventional warfare, by trying to understand this enemy’s motivations, or by attempting to negotiate with people who want us dead. According to the author, the only route to eradicating terrorism is the intimidation option, speaking forcefully and wielding a prodigious stick. Passivity only encourages maniacal Islamists to out-do themselves next time.

    Selected reviews:
    “An Immodest Proposal for Ending and Winning the War on Terror: A Curmudgeon’s Plan for Survival proved to be an exceptional read with a nice blend of smart humor and smart commentary … this book is well worth the time to read, enjoy, and absorb.” — Tom Lindaman, Editor and Publisher, CommonConservative.com (March 1, 2008)

    “Pure evil cannot be reasoned with and reformed. It must be destroyed. And Gene’s well-thought out and well-articulated plan is one that would likely do just that — destroy the enemy.” — Gregg Jackson, author of Conservative Comebacks to Liberal Lies: Issue by Issue Responses to the Most Common Claims of the Left from A to Z.

    This is not a novel but it does feature a denouement, an ugly ending — if we permit that ending. The premise is predicated on past and current events and conclusions drawn from them. They include our allowing the atrocity of 9/11 and our insane strategy of sitting back and waiting patiently for more terrorist attacks. Others have warned of the dangers posed by foreign and domestic terrorists, but no one — until now — has offered a workable strategy of deterrence.

    FBI Director Mueller has said the next attack(s) could be nuclear; he loses sleep over the thought. DHS Chief Chertoff had a “gut feeling” we would be attacked last summer. “Yet, what are we doing to prevent another assault on our homeland? Our borders are farcical, our security measures a charade, our valiant military degraded by war and exhaustion. Meanwhile, a sick Carteresque malaise continues to erode America’s moral foundations, character, and vision,” says the author.


    Newsweek editor, Fareed Zakaria, “supports a policy of ‘resilience’ which presupposes nuclear attacks on our soil after which we can ‘bounce back from a disruption.’ … Would becoming buddies with the likes of Iran or Syria come before or after we’re ‘disrupted’ by a few nuclear attacks, Fareed?”
    “It wasn’t comforting to know that four days after 9/11, Mr. Tenet went to Camp David and presented Mr. Bush with a plan to combat terrorism, a few days late and a few dollars short. The terror horse was long out of the barn and galloping to other targets and Mr. Tenet, Presidential Medal of Freedom in hand, was galloping off to write his book.”
    “It would take a generation or two but a sense of security not experienced since the summer of 2001 will penetrate the American consciousness and spirit. We would come to recognize the bitter truth that, as inhumane as it was, Phase Two was unavoidable.”

    Gene Lalor taught for some twenty-eight years and now resides with his bride of almost forty years on Long Island. He has published frequently on Citizen-Journal.net and on AmericanThinker.com. He is currently serving as senior advisor to a future Congressman.

    An Immodest Proposal for Ending and Winning the War on Terror: A Curmudgeon’s Plan for Survival is published by iUniverse, Inc. [ISBN: 978-0-595-46630-6 (pbk–$14.95) ISBN: 978-0-595-70526-9 (cloth–$24.95) ISBN: 978-0-595-90925-4 (ebk–$6.95) It is available from the publisher, at Amazon.com, Barnes&Noble.com, and at local booksellers.

    Gene Lalor (genelalor.com); http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/; iUniverse.com


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: