Anti-Semites for Obama? Obama for Anti-Semites (and Racists) is Worse!

“Anti-Semites for Obama” by the Tennessee Republican Party barely recognizes the tip of the ugly iceberg. Obama’s association with and refusal to repudiate anti-Semites, racists, and Catholic-haters is indeed a problem, but his open promotion of anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, and racist individuals and organizations is far worse. Let us first examine the taqqiya du jour of the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC), an association of shills that use their nominally Jewish identity to persuade Jewish voters that anti-Semitic and other forms of ordure from Barack Obama’s numerous associates doesn’t stink.

“The Tennessee Republican Party has attempted to smear Barack Obama in a crude, cynical outburst of dirty politics,” said NJDC Executive Director Ira N. Forman. “To use anti-Semitism for political gamesmanship is an insult to Jews of all political persuasions. And frankly, such a blatant stunt isn’t going to fool anyone.”

The National “Jewish” Democratic Council, with its long and extensive record of whitewashing and sanitizing anti-Semitism and other forms of hate while promoting hatred of Christians for political gamesmanship, is an insult not only to Jews but to all decent people of all political persuasions. We can see no other motive behind Ira Forman’s press releases than a desire to whitewash and sanitize at all costs Barack Obama’s willful association with and promotion of professional hate mongers and their reprehensible organizations.

(1) Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam: racist, anti-Semite, and anti-Catholic
(2) Al Sharpton and his National Action Network: racist and anti-Semitic
(3) MoveOn.org: anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, anti-Evangelical, anti-Israel, 9/11 conspiracy theorist
(4) Jeremiah Wright of the Trinity United Church of Christ: racist, anti-American, anti-Israel

While we think the Tennessee Republican Party did not even address Obama’s more serious shortcomings, the following is worth repetition.

Obama has pledged to hold a Muslim Summit to determine Middle East policy with the very leaders that have as their goal to remove Israel from the map, referenced Jews to be “dogs” and “pigs,” among other vile references.

Over the weekend, news reports surfaced casting more disturbing evidence of Obama’s anti-Israel leanings.

The board of a nonprofit organization on which Obama served as a paid director alongside a confessed domestic terrorist granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a “catastrophe.” [In addition, the United Church of Christ has ties to Sabeel and Naim Ateek, which also refer to Al Nakba or The Catastrophe.]

The co-founder of that organization, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, who also has held a fundraiser for Obama, is a harsh critic of Israel and has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror. Khalidi reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group.

The Woods Fund, a Chicago-based nonprofit that describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a $40,000 grant in 2001 to the Arab American Action Network, or AAAN, for which Khalidi’s wife, Mona, serves as president. The Fund provided a second grant to the AAAN for $35,000 in 2002. Obama was a director of the Woods Fund board from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the Fund’s website. Tax records show he was paid $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2001.

Also serving on the Wood’s Fund board alongside Obama was current University of Illinois-Chicago professor William C. Ayers, who was a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971.

“You don’t even have to go outside Obama’s campaign to find advisers who are anti-Israel,” said Bill Hobbs, communications director for the Tennessee Republican Party. “Robert Malley, a principal foreign policy adviser to Obama, has advocated negotiations with the Iranian-funded radical terrorist group Hamas and urged that Hamas – which sends suicide bombers to kill innocent women and children – receive international assistance.”

Obama for Anti-Semites, Racists, and Catholic Haters: Louis Farrakhan
“Anti-Semites for Obama” is not an overly damning statement. Barack Obama has no control over who supports him, just as Ron Paul could not control the endorsement of the Stormfront White Nationalist Community while Congressional candidate Lou Barletta (R-PA) could not keep davidduke.org from putting up a Web page to support him. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) could not keep the anti-Semitic Independence Party from endorsing her, nor could Ronald Reagan stop the Ku Klux Klan from endorsing him in 1980. The reactions of these five individuals to these endorsements is what shows their personal character or total lack thereof.

(1) When Lou Barletta heard that David Duke and/or the Klan was endorsing his candidacy, he said immediately that he did not want their support.
(2) When Hillary Clinton received the Independence Party’s endorsement, she said, “I made it very clear that I did not want their support. I rejected it. I said that it would not be anything I would be comfortable with. And it looked as though I might pay a price for that. But I would not be associated with people who said such inflammatory and untrue charges against either Israel or Jewish people in our country.”
(3) Ronald Reagan said he did not want the Ku Klux Klan’s support, and that he had no tolerance for what the Klan represented.
(4) Ron Paul was condemned by the National Jewish Democratic Council, and rightly so, for refusing to return $500 from Don Black of the Stormfront White Nationalist Community.

(5) On February 24, Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam announced his support for Barack Obama. Louis Farrakhan has a long record of making anti-Semitic statements, calling the Pope the Antichrist, and saying that white people are “potential humans” who “haven’t evolved yet.” Note that Barletta, Clinton, and Reagan did not even have to be asked to reject the support of Klansmen or the Independence Party. Obama, however, refused to use the word “reject” in conjunction with Louis Farrakhan’s support until Tim Russert, with the aid of Hillary Clinton, cornered him like a rat. Here is the actual transcript from the February 26 Presidential debate:

TIM RUSSERT: On Sunday, the headline in your hometown paper, Chicago Tribune: “Louis Farrakhan Backs Obama for President at Nation of Islam Convention in Chicago.” Do you accept the support of Louis Farrakhan?

SEN. OBAMA: You know, I have been very clear in my denunciation of Minister Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic comments. I think that they are unacceptable and reprehensible. I did not solicit this support. He expressed pride in an African-American who seems to be bringing the country together. I obviously can’t censor him, but it is not support that I sought. And we’re not doing anything, I assure you, formally or informally with Minister Farrakhan.

After being asked once (remember that Reagan, Clinton, and Barletta did not even need to be asked), Obama gave a long, convoluted, and evasive answer. Perhaps the best equivalent would be the line from Romeo and Juliet in which a would-be duelist bites his thumb to insult an enemy. Upon being told that the city’s laws would be against him if he actually said, “Yes, I bite my thumb at you,” he said, “I do not bite my thumb at you, Sir, but I do bite my thumb.”

MR. RUSSERT: Do you reject his support?

SEN. OBAMA: Well, Tim, you know, I can’t say to somebody that he can’t say that he thinks I’m a good guy. (Laughter.) You know, I — you know, I — I have been very clear in my denunciations of him and his past statements, and I think that indicates to the American people what my stance is on those comments.

A simple “Yes” would have sufficed unless Obama did not want to offend this prominent bigot and his equally bigoted followers in the Nation of Islam. In other words, Obama wants and needs the support of the African-American equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan.

MR. RUSSERT: The problem some voters may have is, as you know, Reverend Farrakhan called Judaism “gutter religion.”

OBAMA: Tim, I think — I am very familiar with his record, as are the American people. That’s why I have consistently denounced it.

This is not something new. This is something that — I live in Chicago. He lives in Chicago. I’ve been very clear, in terms of me believing that what he has said is reprehensible and inappropriate. And I have consistently distanced myself from him.

“I denounce his statements, but I do not reject his support.”

[material deleted without loss of continuity with regard to Farrakhan]

…HILLARY CLINTON: I just want to add something here, because I faced a similar situation when I ran for the Senate in 2000 in New York. And in New York, there are more than the two parties, Democratic and Republican. And one of the parties at that time, the Independence Patty, was under the control of people who were anti-Semitic, anti-Israel. And I made it very clear that I did not want their support. I rejected it. I said that it would not be anything I would be comfortable with. And it looked as though I might pay a price for that. But I would not be associated with people who said such inflammatory and untrue charges against either Israel or Jewish people in our country. And, you know, I was willing to take that stand, and, you know, fortunately the people of New York supported me and I won. But at the time, I thought it was more important to stand on principle and to reject the kind of conditions that went with support like that.

RUSSERT: Are you suggesting Senator Obama is not standing on principle?

CLINTON: No. I’m just saying that you asked specifically if he would reject it. And there’s a difference between denouncing and rejecting. And I think when it comes to this sort of, you know, inflammatory — I have no doubt that everything that Barack just said is absolutely sincere. [This is a politician’s polite way of saying that her opponent is so full of excrement that she could probably sell Obama’s services as a walking fertilizer cart to half the farmers in Ohio, and let us not forget Marc Antony’s use of “honorable men” in Julius Caesar; it all depends on context.] But I just think, we’ve got to be even stronger. We cannot let anyone in any way say these things because of the implications that they have, which can be so far reaching.

OBAMA: Tim, I have to say I don’t see a difference between denouncing and rejecting. There’s no formal offer of help from Minister Farrakhan that would involve me rejecting it. But if the word “reject” Senator Clinton feels is stronger than the word “denounce,” then I’m happy to concede the point, and I would reject and denounce.

Finally, and only after being driven into a corner and asked for a third time, did Obama “reject” the support of Louis Farrakhan. Obama is meanwhile on record as actually soliciting the support of Al Sharpton and the National Action Network.

Obama for Anti-Semites and Racists: Al Sharpton, the National Action Network, and “Greedy Jew Bastards”

Obama and Sharpton
Senator Barack Obama (Ill): “Reverend Sharpton is a voice for the voiceless, and a voice for the dispossessed. What National Action Network has done is so important to change America, and it must be changed from the bottom up.”

What has the National Action Network done to change America? Try this:
Freddy’s Fashion Mart Fire

Per Fred Siegel’s outstanding Democrats Embrace ‘Impresario of Hatred’

It would have taken no great effort for the reporters covering the Apollo debate to have walked across 125th Street from the theater to visit Freddy’s Fashion Mart, where in 1995 eight people died in a murderous rampage inspired by Mr. Sharpton. …He turned a landlord-tenant dispute between the Jewish owner of Freddy’s and a black subtenant into a theater of hatred. Picketers from Mr. Sharpton’s National Action Network, sometimes joined by “the Rev.” himself, marched daily outside the store, screaming about “bloodsucking Jews” and “Jew bastards” and threatening to burn the building down. After weeks of increasingly violent rhetoric, one of the protesters, Roland Smith, took Mr. Sharpton’s words about ousting the “white interloper” to heart. He ran into the store shouting, “It’s on!” He shot and wounded three whites and a Pakistani, whom he apparently mistook for a Jew. Then he set the fire, which killed five Hispanics, one Guyanese and one African-American–a security guard whom protesters had taunted as a “cracker lover.” Smith then fatally shot himself.

http://www.nationalreview.com/20Mar00/nordlinger032000.html adds, In 1995-four years into the putative New Sharpton-there was another, fatal case in which Sharpton had a guilty hand: Freddy’s Fashion Mart. In Harlem, a white store owner — no, worse: a Jewish one — was accused of driving a black store owner out of business. At one of the many rallies meant to scare the Jewish owner away [can anyone say, “burning crosses meant to scare the Negro owner away?”], Sharpton charged that “there is a systemic and methodical strategy to eliminate our people from doing business off 125th Street. I want to make it clear . . . that we will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business.” Sharpton’s colleague, Morris Powell, said of the Jewish owner — Sharpton’s “white interloper” — “We’re going to see that this cracker suffers. Reverend Sharpton is on it.”


The Nine Lives of Al Sharpton
By John Perazzo

The contentious activist then challenged local Jews—who he derisively characterized as “diamond merchants” —to “pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house” to settle the score. Finally he claimed, without proof, that the Jewish driver had run over the Cato child while in a drunken stupor. [This is not legal advice, but a false accusation of killing someone while driving drunk–a felony in NY–could in fact be libelous, not that this ever stopped Sharpton from hurling defamatory accusations.]

Stirred in part by such rhetoric and false accusations, hundreds of Crown Heights blacks took violently to the streets, pelting Jewish homes with rocks, setting vehicles on fire, and shouting “Jew! Jew!” [Can anyone say “Night of the Broken Glass?”] The riots continued for three days and nights. Sharpton’s response: “We must not reprimand our children for outrage, when it is the outrage that was put in them by an oppressive system.” Five days after the original car accident that had triggered the violence, Sharpton led 400 shouting protesters through the heart of the Crown Heights Jewish community, shouting “No justice, no peace!”

…In 1995, Sharpton led his National Action Network in an ugly boycott against Freddy’s Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem, New York. The boycott started when Freddy’s owners announced that because they wanted to expand their own business, they would no longer sublet part of their store to a black-owned record shop. The street leader of the boycott, Morris Powell, was the head of Sharpton’s “Buy Black” Committee. Repeatedly referring to the Jewish proprietors of Freddy’s as “crackers,” Powell and his fellow protesters menacingly told passersby, “Keep [going] right on past Freddy’s, he’s one of the greedy Jew bastards killing our [black] people. Don’t give the Jew a dime.

All of this occurred under the watchful, approving eye of Sharpton, who provided some additional sound bites for the media: “We will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so some white interloper can expand his business on 125th Street…There is a systematic and methodical strategy to eliminate our people from doing business on 125th Street….[O]ne of our brothers…is now being threatened.”

Obama has been sending us junk E-mail for months in a futile attempt to get us to give him our vote and money. Sorry, Barack, no one is here but us “white interlopers” and “greedy Jew bastards,” to use the terminology of Al Sharpton and his friends. Just as Morris Powell told Sharpton’s mob, “Don’t give the Jew a dime,” we doubt that Obama wants or needs the votes of any “bloodsucking Jews,” “cracker lovers,” or “crackers.”

Obama for Anti-Semites and Catholic Haters: MoveOn.org
Obama/Pope
Res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself. It is a matter of record that MoveOn.org’s Action Forum, while under the editorial control of MoveOn’s moderators, welcomed the most vicious imaginable hate speech against Jews, Catholics, and Evangelical Christians.

Congressman Tom Lantos told PM Olmert of Israel that he wants to freeze the $ 230 million U.S. aid package to Lebanon. Lantos is the ranking democrat on the House Foreign Relations Comte. Lantos said, “The [Lebanese] aid package should be witheld until the Lebanese government displays responsibility”. Responsibility ? Israel is guilty of war crimes in their cowardely attack on Lebanon and the whining, arrogant Jew wants Lebanon to demonstrate responsibility ! This is another example of how many Jews/Zioniosts in our Congress use the U.S. for their own greedy purposes. DUMP ISRAEL.
  14 out of 17 voted to AGREE with this.

That is, of the 17 MoveOn.org people who voted on this statement, 14 agreed with it.

We can all see how AIPAC/Israel has taken control of America. Not to get nasty but jews have a long history of subverting governments for their own enrichment and glory to the detriment of whole societies. Many more than “6 million” have died by semetic aggression, 100’s of millions even, remember the conqueror writes history. Even the roman empire feared jewish power. Over and over again, whites, particularly semites have distorted truth through their supremacist, zenophobic minds. Ariel Sharon Oct of 2001 per Kol Israel, “… Don’t worry about america, we control america and the americans know it.” There is a mental pathology gripping my tribe, as the native americans say, “white man have forked tongue”, we must become enlightened, or we will be destroyed.
  13 of 16 voted to AGREE with this

In truth, Zionists have committed more massacres per capita than any other people on earth since Adam and Eve. In fact, one can safely say that wanton killings and massacres are piece and parcel of being Zionist.
  I understand that there are Jews who condemn the pornographic slaughter in Gaza, people like Uri Avneri and like-minded Jews. We salute those people, who are our natural partners in the quest for a just and durable peace in Palestine.
  However, it is also true that the vast bulk of Israeli Jews are enjoying the killings of Palestinian children and are congratulating each other.
  Just take a look at Jewish internet sites in Israel and abroad and see how Jewish youngsters are congratulating each other on the killings of these helpless toddlers in Gaza.
  This murderous cannibalism doesn’t come out of the blue. Today in Israel, school curricula are dominated by the Talmud, especially a specific Talmudic text called Shulhan Aruch.
  In this text, Jews are commanded to slaughter non-Jews who are viewed more or less as animals or at least lesser human beings.

MoveOn.org “documentery,” The Eternal Jew

“Get the Israel obsessed Jews out of Congress”

Removing all Israeli obsessed Jews from congress would stop a lot of killing.
  12 of 14 voted to AGREE with this

Condoleeza Rice and Colin Powell are House Slaves

Thanks Harry, for telling it like it is. Rice and Powell ARE “house slaves”. And the “Republicans ARE like the Jews who worked for Hitler”. And Shrub IS “a tyrant and a terrorist”. Harry, we need people like you in Congress.
  12 of 15 voted to AGREE with this

But until the priests are hounded down and arrested like the baby rapers they are, the neverending cycle will continue. You want to throw a monkey wrench in both political parties? Call for the arrest and immediate incarceration of the Catholic Pedophiles of America. Then we can do a little research. These priests were teachers. Find out who their students were and do a cross reference to see how many elected leaders were “educated” by them. Records of arrests for pedophilia have been kept for years. Are the hotspots of pedophilia in areas where the priests were relocated to? Until our elected leaders pursue this matter we won’t know if the people we entrust our children to are people we can trust, or people trying to lower the age of consent to birth.
  8 out of 9 voted to AGREE with this

The vicitm class will expand until you too can be jailed for ridiculously minor offenses while the Catholics are raping your children.
  94% voted to AGREE that the Catholics are raping your children.

Obama for Racists, Israel-Haters, and America Haters: Jeremiah Wright
Obama’s pastor Jeremiah Wright, who said “white America” got a “wake up call” after 9/11, wrote a “War in Iraq IQ test.” It speaks for itself.

41. Q: How many UN resolutions did Israel violate by 1992?A: Over 65

42. Q: How many UN resolutions on Israel did America veto between 1972 and 1990?

A: 30+

43. Q: How much does the U.S. fund Israel a year?

A:$5 billion

44. Q: How many countries are known to have nuclear weapons?

A: 8

45. Q: How many nuclear warheads has Iraq got?

A: 0

46. Q: How many nuclear warheads has US got?

A: Over 10,000

47. Q: Which is the only country to use nuclear weapons?A: The US

48. Q: How many nuclear warheads does Israel have?

A: Over 400

49. Q: Has Israel ever allowed UN weapon inspections?

A: No

50. Q: What percentage of the Palestinian territories are controlled by Israeli settlements?

A: 42%

51. Q: Is Israel illegally occupying Palestinian land?A: Yes

52. Q: Which country do you think poses the greatest threat to global peace: Iraq or the U.S.?A: ????

Res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself. Not only do racists, anti-Semites, and Catholic-haters support Barack Obama, Barack Obama supports racists, anti-Semites, and Catholic-haters.

NOTE: READERS ARE FREE TO COPY AND QUOTE THIS MATERIAL FREELY AS LONG AS NO CHANGES ARE MADE AND ALL STATEMENTS ARE KEPT IN CONTEXT. IT IS OF CRITICAL IMPORTANCE THAT BARACK OBAMA BE EXPOSED FOR THE FRAUD, MEDIA-CREATED SCAM, AND PHONY SMILE ON TOP OF AN EMPTY SUIT THAT HE IS.

=======================
Pro-life? Don’t forget that Obama also supports live birth abortion (yes, “live birth abortion,” which is worse than partial birth abortion)–a position that even Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), one of the most liberal members of Congress, finds reprehensible. Please circulate this information as widely as possible.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: