Archive for November, 2007

Do you Need TrustedID or Other Identity Theft Protection Services?

November 29, 2007

TrustedID has joined with OfficeMax in pandering to the terrorist enablers at the Council on American Islamic Relations. As stated by CAIR,

A representative of TrustedID, an identity theft protection company, wrote to CAIR: “We have already cancelled all our advertising on Michael Savage’s radio show last month and our last radio spot ad will run this Monday.”

We are not attorneys and cannot give legal advice on identity theft or how to prevent it, but we can describe the measures we take to protect ourselves against identity theft. None of these involve paying TrustedID or the credit reporting agencies a hefty monthly fee for security measures that are either free, or cost a lot less. (more…)

Does the ADL Sanitize Anti-Semites to Protect the Democrat Left?

November 21, 2007

A review of recent actions by Abraham Foxman and the Anti-Defamation League raises some unpleasant questions. Is the ADL carrying forward its stated mission of opposing anti-Semitism, racism, and other forms of bigotry, or is it running interference for the often anti-Semitic left wing of the Democratic Party?

This November, Mr. Foxman issued a joint statement with the prominent racist and anti-Semite Al Sharpton and his National Action Network. The National Action Network is the same organization that, under Sharpton’s personal leadership, paraded around a Jewish-owned store in Harlem while yelling racial and anti-Semitic epithets, along with an arson threat that was later put into effect. There is no difference between what Sharpton and the National Action Network did to Freddy’s Fashion Mart and what the Ku Klux Klan once did to African-Americans who moved into the “wrong” neighborhoods. By making a joint statement with Sharpton, and by lending what is left of the Anti-Defamation League’s good name to this, Foxman sanitized and whitewashed a vicious anti-Semite and hate monger in the same league as David Duke and Tom Metzger. Al Sharpton could become a serious liability to next year’s Democratic nominee, and a clean bill of health from the ADL would go a long way toward reducing this vulnerability. (more…)

Anti-Defamation League: A Sick Joke, Lie, and Fraud

November 18, 2007

Abraham Foxman Joins Prominent Anti-Semite and Racist in Joint Statement

Nazi concentration camps turned the respectable German slogan Arbeit Macht Frei (Work Makes you Free) into a sick joke, because the inmates were there to be worked to death or exterminated in gas chambers. Abraham Foxman, the same individual who whitewashed’s anti-Semitic hate speech, contributed to a diplomatic crisis with Turkey by sticking ADL’s collective nose into the Armenian genocide issue while causing senior ADL leaders to quit in disgust, has now turned the Anti-Defamation League into an equally sick joke.

National Jewish Democratic Council Can’t Even Get Its Position Straight

November 13, 2007

We would never stand next to the National Jewish Democratic Council’s Steve Rabin and Jordan Lubeck in a men’s room unless we were wearing rubber boots. These worthies apparently never read the adage, “We aim to please, you aim too, please,” as shown by their recent commentary on evangelist Pat Robertson’s endorsement of Rudy Giuliani. In their desperate effort to piddle on Giuliani, they appear to have successfully targeted only each other’s feet. (more…)

U.S. Flags Topple when Hillary Clinton walks past!

November 12, 2007

According to Penn State legend, the stone obelisk that marks the geographical center of Pennsylvania will fall over when a virgin walks past. We now have photographic evidence of what happens to the U.S. Flag when Hillary Clinton walks past!

National Jewish Democratic Council Backs Anti-Israel Group

November 9, 2007

NJDC Squarely Behind Organization that Defends Islamofascism and Promotes Hatred of Israel

“Birds of a feather flock together” is a parable that dates back to Aesop if not before. The National Jewish Democratic Council, aka National Jihad Democratic Crescent, is now flocking with the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee. It is eminently clear that the National Jewish Democratic Council does not speak for any responsible American Jews whatsoever, a conclusion that is reinforced by the organization’s habit of spewing both anti-Christian and anti-Semitic propaganda.


November 5, 2007

Today, the New Jersey Chapter of the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC) condemned State Senator Gerald Cardinale and his wife, Demarest Councilwoman Carole Cardinale for implying that political opponent Joseph Ariyan is soft on terror and anti-Semitism because his law partner is affiliated with a group which defends Arab-Americans from discrimination.

We shall see that the group in question does a lot more than “defend Arab-Americans from discrimination,” although the concept of telling the entire truth as opposed to half-truths is a concept with which NJDC is totally unfamiliar. (more…)

Clinton Campaign Funded by Terror Suspects

November 7, 2007

Hillary takes cash from terror suspects: Muslim donors targets of federal investigation

Presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., has taken thousands of dollars in cash donations from Islamists under federal investigation for terror-financing, money laundering and tax fraud, WND has learned.

The Democrat senator over the past seven months has received $1,000 from M. Yaqub Mirza and another $500 from M. Omar Ashraf, federal campaign records show. Federal agents raided the Virginia homes and offices of the Muslim donors after 9/11 for ties to terrorism.

Others tied to the still-active probe also have contributed money to Clinton, including one Muslim man who after 9/11 complained the U.S. government should focus on changing its Mideast policies instead of killing Osama bin Laden and other Islamic terrorists.

Mirza, who also has given to other candidates, including Republicans, is said to act on behalf of Saudi millionaire Yassin al-Qadi, who the U.S. Treasury Department in October 2001 blacklisted as an al-Qaida financier.

Res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself.

At What Point Should Laws Be Ignored?

November 4, 2007

Broken Social Contracts versus the Rule of Law

‘This Will Make Voter Fraud Easier’: Why does Mrs. Clinton want driver’s licenses for illegal aliens? is raising some very serious questions as to the very legitimacy of the governments of New York, Iowa, Maryland, and other states. The opinion piece’s content, in fact, raises a serious issue: at what point should citizens consider themselves free to ignore–and, more importantly, juries refuse to enforce–laws that are passed by their states’ legislatures?

What we are about to discuss is not really a proposal or a call to action. We are merely serving as the bringer of what Eliot Spitzer will doubtlessly call bad news: the natural consequences of violating the basic and fundamental laws of human behavior. As stated by Henry Ford,

So, while the people are indeed supreme over the written Constitution, the spiritual constitution is supreme over them. The French Revolutionists wrote constitutions too- every drunken writer among them tossed off a constitution. Where are they? All vanished. Why? Because they were not in harmony with the constitution of the universe. The power of the Constitution is not dependent on any Government, but on its inherent rightness and practicability.

This is the underlying concept behind the social contract, in which the people agree to obey their government while the government agrees to defend the natural rights of the people. It is well known that, when one party to a contract breaks his agreement, the other party’s duty to honor the agreement ends. A strong argument can be made that, after New York City police refused to respond to 911 calls from Crown Heights’ Jewish residents while Al Sharpton’s mob was rampaging through the neighborhood and killing a Jew, New York City no longer has any gun laws, handgun control or otherwise, that anyone has any moral obligation to respect or, as a juror, any legal duty to enforce. The same applies to California’s gun control laws after Los Angeles’ police told homeowners and store owners, “You’re on your own” during the riots. New York and California broke their part of the social contract, which relieves their citizens of any moral duty to obey their governments with regards to what they are allowed to own for the purpose of defending their natural human rights (including the right to not be beaten to a pulp by a rioter, as a truck driver was in Los Angeles).

The same argument can be made in any state whose laws say that the police are under no obligation to protect any individual citizen, or at least to make the best possible effort to do so. Any such law or court ruling is an immediate breach of the social contract through which the government in question derives its authority. If this sounds like contempt or disrespect for authority, it must be remembered that authority figures that display lack of responsibility bring this contempt and disrespect on themselves. We are only the messenger who is delivering the bad news, not the agency of the negative consequences themselves. The agency consists of the natural laws of human behavior in combination with the authority figure’s own behavioral choices. (more…)

NJDC’s Ira Forman Reponsible for Hate Cartoon

November 3, 2007

We previously reported on the National Jewish Democratic Council’s “Bubbie versus the GOP” video, which is for at least part of the time “Bubbie versus Christians and Jesus.” The problem with the video isn’t its portrayal of Republicans as red-robed cabalists and monsters–that’s just political mud-slinging–but the depiction of Christians, Jesus, and the Cross in a “This is the Enemy” context. 

As shown by the Jewish Daily Forward, the hate video was published not only on the watch of NJDC Executive Director Ira Forman (the same individual who lied to Jewish voters about not being a haven for anti-Semitic hate speech), but under his express supervision.

 Ira Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council, says his group commissioned the satirical cartoon, “Bubbie Versus the GOP,” in order to reach the “Generation Y” crowd that tunes into politics through such humor-laden vehicles as Jon Stewart’s cable-news satire “The Daily Show” and the Web site “JibJab,” which shows animated political parodies set to folksongs.

…The Republicans gained an ally in Anti-Defamation League National Director Abraham Foxman, who said the video “crosses the line of sensitivity” and “pits Jews against Christians” by presenting the GOP as a “star chamber court in religious garb.” [He omits the fact that a Christian Cross is the centerpiece of the cabal in question, as shown below.] He said he was “saddened and disappointed” that the NJDC had used “stereotypic forms” and “conspiracy theories” to appeal to the Jewish community. “We, who have suffered from conspiracy theories, should be against it,” he said.

The Anti-Defamation League doesn’t spell out even a fraction of it, as shown by the screenshots below. (more…)

Barack Obama says Hillary Clinton is “Vague and Dismissive.”

November 2, 2007

Remember, this is from her fellow Democratic Senator and not from any Republican. Please copy and circulate as widely as possible.

This week’s debate has received a lot of attention, but at least one major issue remains unresolved.When asked several direct questions about the release of official records from her time in the White House, Senator Clinton gave a vague and dismissive answer.

These documents, according to Newsweek, include Senator Clinton’s “appointment calendar as First Lady, her notes at strategy meetings, what advice she gave her husband and his advisers, what policy memos she wrote, even some key papers from her health-care task force.”

It’s time to turn the page on this kind of secrecy and restore trust in our government.

If Senator Clinton is going to run on her record, the American people deserve to see it.

Watch the video of Barack’s exchange with Senator Clinton, learn about his plan to restore trust, and support the call for a more open and transparent government.

[fundraising link deleted]

Throughout his career, Barack has fought for increased government transparency and accountability.

He passed aggressive legislation on campaign finance reform and ethics regulation. He proposed a landmark plan to reveal earmarks in federal appropriations bills. And he is setting a new standard of openness in campaign fundraising.

Earlier this year he released a detailed plan to get us on track, titled “Restoring Trust in Government and Improving Transparency.”

Barack believes that when the government makes a decision that affects your life, you deserve to know about it. When government officials meet with corporate lobbyists, you should be able to watch the meeting. When your tax dollars are appropriated for a government program, you deserve to know where they are going and who requested them.

Anything less is politics-as-usual.

Learn more about how Barack would restore trust in our government and bring people back into the political process:

[fundraising link deleted]

Senator Clinton’s refusal to answer direct questions and disclose her records is a perfect example of what needs to change in Washington.

For the past seven years we have endured one of the most secretive administrations in American history. The time has come to turn the page and rebuild trust in our government.

We must demand more from those seeking the presidency.

Support the call for a more open and transparent government:

[fundraising link deleted]

Thanks for your support,


David Plouffe
Campaign Manager
Obama for America