This is why Obama Promotes Hatred of Catholics

Barack and probably Michelle Obama don’t like Catholics very much, and it easy to see why. While very few Americans of any religion have any use for atrocities like partial birth abortion and infanticide, Catholics provide much of the pro-life movement’s leadership. Catholics are therefore a major threat to Obama’s political aspirations, and this doubtlessly plays a major role in Obama’s promotion of anti-Catholic hate organizations.

As shown below, MoveOn.org circulated an anti-Catholic hate cartoon that is very similar to the work of the infamous 19th century cartoonist Thomas Nast. In addition, MoveOn.org’s now disgraced Action Forum welcomed the most vicious imaginable anti-Catholic (as well as anti-Semitic) hate speech with the full knowledge and approval of MoveOn.org’s moderators. It therefore comes as no surprise that Barack Obama solicited and obtained the endorsement of MoveOn.org.

Pro-life activist Jill Stanek has done an outstanding job in exposing the Obamas’ support of not just partial birth abortion but infanticide of living babies. Stanek provided a screenshot of a fundraising letter in which Harvard lawyer Michelle Obama equates a ban on partial birth abortion to an attack on Roe v. Wade, as if a woman’s right to terminate a first-trimester pregnancy is somehow dependent on a “right” to kill a viable third trimester baby.

From: email-list@obamaforillinois.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 7:41 AM
Subject: A Message from Michelle Obama

February 17, 2004

Dear Friends:

We have all been concerned lately with the rise of conservatism in this country, especially as it relates to women. You�ve read the alarming news about the Justice Department’s request for hospitals to turn over the private medical records of dozens of patients. This cynical ploy is designed to intimidate a group of physicians and force them to drop their lawsuit seeking to have the so-called partial birth abortion ban ruled unconstitutional.

The fact remains, with no provision to protect the health of the mother, this ban on a legitimate medical procedure is clearly unconstitutional and must be overturned. Attorney General Ashcroft and President Bush believe so zealously in their cause that the privacy rights of patients are under assault. They believe we have no federal right to privacy when it concerns our medical histories.

On March 16th, we have a chance to nominate a candidate who will be tireless in the fight to protect women. It isn’t simply about the right to choose, or privacy rights. It is about pay equity, about ending domestic violence, promoting health care around the world, and letting doctors decide treatment options, not federal judges.

It goes without saying that we must win back the U.S. Senate and hold our ground as a check against the right-wing executive branch. Illinois will be a key battleground and your vote is critical.

My husband has stood up for women time and again, and I am proud of his record. He understands that casting a vote on the floor of the Senate takes greater courage than issuing a position paper. Oftentimes, a well intentioned law is in fact a flawed law. That’s why it is critical we nominate someone who has faced these tough choices. That’s why nominating an experienced legislator is so important in this race. It takes courage to cast a vote.

Who among the Democrats running has a proven record? Who among the candidates running for the Senate in Illinois has stood up to the right wing politicians and voted against their agenda? Who can we count on to keep the Bush/Ashcroft team from appointing the Supreme Court Justice that will vote against Roe v. Wade?

Please join me in sending a message of unity and strength by attending the Women for Obama Luncheon on February 23rd at the Hyatt Regency. Lunch costs $150 and includes remarks from our friends the Reverend Willie Barrow and Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky. To reserve your seat please call the campaign office headquarters at 312-427-6400 or log on to the Obama for Illinois Website.

I urge you to stand with me and support my husband at this event. You know the stakes have never been higher and we can’t depend on untested amateurs and administrators in this fight. Barack is a fighter and he will be a champion we can be proud of.

Thanks you so much for all of your support.

Signature: Michelle Obama

Barack Obama, however, goes even further than his wife by promoting LIVE BIRTH ABORTION. Per “Obama’s constitutional crisis” by Jill Stanek,

Here is what Obama said when arguing against Illinois’ Born Alive Infants Protection Act during Senate floor debate. This was legislation clarifying the terms “person,” “human being,” “child,” and “individual” in Illinois statutes included any baby born alive, no matter what gestational age or circumstance of birth:

“… I just want to suggest… that this is probably not going to survive constitutional scrutiny.”

“Number one, whenever we define a pre-viable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a – child, a 9-month-old – child that was delivered to term. That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place.”

“I mean, it – it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute. For that purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional.”

Incredible stuff. Not only did Obama make no sense, he showed just how far he would go to safeguard abortion.

…Three, even if a pre-viable baby survives an abortion, the pregnancy has been terminated. The mother got what she wanted. What more does Obama need, a dead baby? Yes.

It may be noted that Jerrold Nadler, one of the most liberal members of Congress, said of the Federal Born Alive Infants Protection Act, “There is no such thing as a right to a live birth abortion.” Barack Obama, however, seems to think there is.

Noting that Michelle Obama is on record as supporting partial birth abortion while her husband goes even further than live birth abortion, it comes as no surprise that Obama had to be asked three times on national television by Tim Russert and Hillary Clinton before he would “reject” the support of the Catholic-hating bigot Louis Farrakhan, who called the Pope the Antichrist. It comes as no surprise that Obama actively solicited and accepted the support of MoveOn.org, which published an anti-Catholic hate cartoon every bit as vicious as anything that ever came from the pencil of Thomas Nast, along with material of the following nature. These are verbatim excerpts from MoveOn.org’s disgraced Action Forum.

Nothing is being said about the five Catholic justices, three of whom would rewrite the constitution to destroy Church/State separation. They believe that God, the bible and faith supercede our Constitution, and that our leaders are acting with divine sanction. I know that Article VI states that religion shall not be a test for public office. It does not say, however, that the Senate can not question someone who hold beliefs that are in oppostion to the constitution, which all office holders must swear to uphold. The idea of a “Unitary Executive” has been praised by Alito. He clearly believes in a hierarchial concept of government, rather than one which comes from the governed. Why was this not highlighted by the Senate and the press?

29 out of 30 MoveOn.org Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this

This anti-Catholic hate speech is 100 percent consistent with the offical MoveOn.org photomanipulation of Pope Benedict waving a gavel in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.

But until the priests are hounded down and arrested like the baby rapers they are, the neverending cycle will continue. You want to throw a monkey wrench in both political parties? Call for the arrest and immediate incarceration of the Catholic Pedophiles of America. Then we can do a little research. These priests were teachers. Find out who their students were and do a cross reference to see how many elected leaders were “educated” by them. Records of arrests for pedophilia have been kept for years. Are the hotspots of pedophilia in areas where the priests were relocated to? Until our elected leaders pursue this matter we won’t know if the people we entrust our children to are people we can trust, or people trying to lower the age of consent to birth.

8 out of 9 MoveOn.org people voted to AGREE with this

The vicitm class will expand until you too can be jailed for ridiculously minor offenses while the Catholics are raping your children.

94% of MoveOn.org people voted to AGREE that the Catholics are raping your children

If the Catholics and Southern Baptists can gang up on the rest of America to further their plans for world domination. Then a group of highly trained espionage experts shouldn’t have a problem organising the attacks of 9/11. The red flag that keeps bothering me is the fact that not one of the sycophants that stopped the information flow has been publicly fired or chastised. Their identities have been kept absolutely secret. Every investigation has come to the conclusion that certain individuals stopped the information flow. Arrest those individuals for incompetence that led to the deaths of 5000 Americans. It’s either incompetance or collusion. By protecting the identities of these individuals BushCo will forever carry the blame for 9/11. When listening to Republicans always remember that their primary objective is to protect their upline. George liked the 2800 number when it came time to pay. But 5000 sounds a lot better when you are trying to justify torture.

19 out of 21 voted to AGREE with this

The Obamas’ support for partial and even live birth abortion is doubtlessly why Barack Obama went out of his way to solicit the support of an anti-Catholic hate group. It is vital to circulate this information to Catholic voters so they, as well as all decent Americans who have no tolerance for racial, religious, or ethnic hate-mongering, can repudiate Obama and his entourage of Catholic-hating bigots in November.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One Response to “This is why Obama Promotes Hatred of Catholics”

  1. berlet98 Says:

    Ms. Stanek, with you in the Pro-Life corner, we definitely WILL win this battle against the infanticidists who have already chalked up 50 MILLION victims!

    May God bless you!

    Please see my article on abortion on my website: http://genelalor.com/

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: